Our work must begin by making some basic decisions about our budget -- decisions that will have a huge impact on the strength of our recovery.

我們的工作必須從如何決定我們的預(yù)算開(kāi)始——這些決定將對(duì)我們復(fù)蘇的勢(shì)頭有巨大影響。

Over the last few years, both parties have worked together to reduce the deficit by more than $2.5 trillion -- mostly through spending cuts, but also by raising tax rates on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans. As a result, we are more than halfway towards the goal of $4 trillion in deficit reduction that economists say we need to stabilize our finances.

過(guò)去幾年，兩黨共同努力，削減了2.5萬(wàn)億美元的赤字——大部分是通過(guò)削減支出進(jìn)行的，當(dāng)然我們也對(duì)最富有的1%的美國(guó)人提高了稅率。結(jié)果就是，我們已經(jīng)完成了經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家認(rèn)為的足以穩(wěn)定財(cái)政的削減赤字4萬(wàn)億美元任務(wù)的一半還要多。

Now we need to finish the job. And the question is, how?

現(xiàn)在我們需要完成這項(xiàng)任務(wù)。問(wèn)題是，怎樣完成？

In 2011, Congress passed a law saying that if both parties couldn’t agree on a plan to reach our deficit goal, about a trillion dollars’ worth of budget cuts would automatically go into effect this year. These sudden, harsh, arbitrary cuts would jeopardize our military readiness. They’d devastate priorities like education, and energy, and medical research. They would certainly slow our recovery, and cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. That’s why Democrats, Republicans, business leaders, and economists have already said that these cuts, known here in Washington as the sequester, are a really bad idea.

2011年，國(guó)會(huì)通過(guò)了一個(gè)議案。議案稱(chēng)如果兩黨不能對(duì)削減赤字達(dá)成一致，那么價(jià)值約1萬(wàn)億美元的預(yù)算削減將會(huì)自動(dòng)生效。這些突然的、殘酷的、武斷的削減，將會(huì)使我們的軍事準(zhǔn)備陷入危險(xiǎn)。這也將會(huì)使教育、能源及醫(yī)療科研等優(yōu)先問(wèn)題惡化。這將會(huì)毫無(wú)疑問(wèn)地減緩我們的經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇，并且還會(huì)讓我們付出成百上千個(gè)就業(yè)崗位的代價(jià)。這就是為什么民主黨員們、共和黨員們、商業(yè)領(lǐng)袖們以及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家們已經(jīng)說(shuō)過(guò)，在華盛頓被認(rèn)為是一種扣押行為的這些削減措施，是一個(gè)確實(shí)無(wú)誤的壞主意。

Now, some in Congress have proposed preventing only the defense cuts by making even bigger cuts to things like education and job training, Medicare and Social Security benefits. That idea is even worse. (Applause.)

現(xiàn)在，國(guó)會(huì)中的某些人已經(jīng)開(kāi)始提議防止通過(guò)更大幅度的削減教育、職業(yè)培訓(xùn)、老年保健醫(yī)療體系和社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)津貼的經(jīng)費(fèi)以削減國(guó)防經(jīng)費(fèi)。(掌聲)

Yes, the biggest driver of our long-term debt is the rising cost of health care for an aging population. And those of us who care deeply about programs like Medicare must embrace the need for modest reforms -- otherwise, our retirement programs will crowd out the investments we need for our children, and jeopardize the promise of a secure retirement for future generations.

是的，目前推動(dòng)我們長(zhǎng)期債務(wù)最大的推手是，養(yǎng)老醫(yī)療保障費(fèi)用的增加。那些非常關(guān)心我們老年保健醫(yī)療體系的人必須接受適度的改革——否則，我們退休項(xiàng)目將會(huì)比我們對(duì)孩子們的投入更龐大，而且會(huì)使得未來(lái)幾代人的退休保障更加危險(xiǎn)。

But we can’t ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and the most powerful. (Applause.) We won’t grow the middle class simply by shifting the cost of health care or college onto families that are already struggling, or by forcing communities to lay off more teachers and more cops and more firefighters. Most Americans -- Democrats, Republicans, and independents -- understand that we can’t just cut our way to prosperity. They know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share. And that’s the approach I offer tonight.

但是，我們不能讓老人和工薪家庭承擔(dān)削減赤字的重任的同時(shí)，不去向最富有的最有影響力的人征收更多的稅收。(掌聲)我們不會(huì)通過(guò)向那些已經(jīng)在艱苦奮斗的家庭簡(jiǎn)單地提升醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)經(jīng)費(fèi)或者大學(xué)學(xué)費(fèi)抑或是強(qiáng)迫社區(qū)裁掉更多的老師、警察、消防員的方法以擴(kuò)充我們的中產(chǎn)階級(jí)。大多數(shù)美國(guó)人——民主黨員們、共和黨員們、獨(dú)立人士——理解我們并不能削減掉我們通往繁榮的道路。他們知道，我們基礎(chǔ)廣泛的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)，需要的是一個(gè)可以削減支出和稅收的每一個(gè)人都各司其職的平衡的途徑以抵達(dá)赤字削減的目標(biāo)。這就是今晚我要提出的方案。

On Medicare, I’m prepared to enact reforms that will achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission. (Applause.)

關(guān)于老年保健醫(yī)療體系，我已準(zhǔn)備頒布改革方案，那將在下一個(gè)10年開(kāi)始時(shí)，實(shí)現(xiàn)同等數(shù)額的保健資金儲(chǔ)備。這一改革方案是由國(guó)會(huì)內(nèi)跨黨派的辛普森-鮑爾斯委員會(huì)草擬提交的。(掌聲)