国产av不卡一区二区_欧美xxxx做受欧美_成年人看的毛片_亚洲第一天堂在线观看_亚洲午夜精品久久久中文影院av_8x8ⅹ国产精品一区二区二区_久久精品国产sm调教网站演员_亚洲av综合色区无码一二三区_成人免费激情视频_国产九九九视频

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
World / Asia-Pacific

Ambassador Liu Xiaoming gives interview to Reuters on the South China Sea

(chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2016-07-07 18:56

Ambassador Liu Xiaoming gives interview to Reuters on the South China Sea

Screenshot of Reuters' report on South China Sea. [Photo/Web]

On July 4th, the Reuters website carried an article based on a joint interview with Chinese Ambassador Liu Xiaoming on June 9th by the Reuters' global news editor Alessandra Galloni, business and news investigation editor Simon Robinson, Breakingviews' editor John Foley, European Politics and Economics editor Mark John and Asia Top News editor Mike Collett-White. The article is entitled "Ahead of key court ruling, Beijing in propaganda overdrive".

The following is the transcript of the interview.

Alessandra Galloni: Maybe we could start with if you could tell us where we are now in terms of what your position is vis-a-vis the ruling that is about to happen?

Ambassador Liu: Our position had been reaffirmed by the statement just issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs regarding this arbitration initiated by the Philippines: China will not participate in the arbitration. From day one, China strongly opposed this arbitration case. We believe it is illegal for a tribunal to handle this case.

First of all, the Philippine's arbitration case is against UNCLOS, because sovereignty and territorial disputes are not under the jurisdiction of UNCLOS.

Secondly, Philippine's case is also related to maritime delimitation. China, like 30 other countries, made a declaration in 2006, that China will not take part in third party arbitration when it comes to maritime delimitation. UK is one of the 30 countries. UNCLOS provides that sovereign countries have their sovereign right to make these declarations on optional exceptions.

Thirdly, China has always been calling for bilateral consultation and negotiations with neighboring countries, including the Philippines, when it comes to maritime disputes. And a series of documents can show that the Philippines agrees to this practice. There are a series of statements between China and the Philippines on how to resolve disputes. It was until 2013 when they submitted this arbitration case. In our view, the Philippines have turned their back on their promise and that is against international practice. Once agreed, you have to follow your commitment.

It is also part of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) reached by China and the ASEAN countries that disputes should be resolved by peaceful means through friendly consultations and negotiations by sovereign states directly concerned. The Philippines agreed to it but turned their back on it.

Fourthly, this arbitration, according to UNCLOS, is only a supplementary means to resolve disputes. Bilateral channel is regarded as the main means to resolve a dispute between countries.

The Philippines had never come to China to talk about this arbitration. And China and the Philippines had never had serious negotiations on this subject back then. That means the main channel had never been used, to say nothing about being exhausted before the Philippines went to arbitration. That is against the spirit of UNCLOS.

So we have many reasons to oppose this arbitration case. We also hold the position that if this arbitration goes through, it will set a very bad example. That concern has been expressed not only by Chinese legal experts, but also by British and Dutch experts on the Law of the Sea. China's position has been supported and appreciated by many countries and international organizations, many legal experts, not only in China, in Asia, but also in Europe and America. That is our basic position.

Some people try to label China as not respecting international law if we reject this arbitration.

But that is totally wrong. What China is doing is exactly safeguarding the authority and seriousness of international law, safeguarding the letter and spirit of UNCLOS. We do not know and do not care when this arbitration decision will be made. No matter what decision this tribunal is going to make, we think it is totally wrong. It has no impact on China and China's sovereignty over these islands and reefs will not be bound by it. It will set a serious, wrong, and bad example. We will not fight in the court, but we will certainly fight for our sovereignty.

Alessandra Galloni: You mention that there are countries supporting China's position. How many countries are on your side on this matter?

Ambassador Liu: There are many. Some countries issue statements. During China-Russia-India Foreign Ministers Meeting, a joint statement was published, endorsing China's position. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization supported China's position. Some ASEAN countries, African countries, European countries, dozens of them – quite a few countries appreciate China's position.

Mike Collett-White: When you talk about support for China's position, you mean the position that this arbitration process is not legitimate?

Ambassador Liu: In different countries, they have focus on different parts of this case. But on the whole, they appreciate and support China's position that this should be resolved through bilateral channels rather than put up for arbitration by the tribunal. Because according to international law, that tribunal cannot handle that case without the consent of both sides of the dispute. The Philippines unilaterally submitted this case to the tribunal. They never consulted with China before they submitted it to the so-called tribunal. They did it at our surprise. They did it at the expense of China's national interests. It is a serious damage to the national interest of China. So China is fighting for its sovereignty and its national interests. What is more, we are fighting for justice. In terms of essence and procedure, it is wrong for the tribunal to handle this case.

Mike Collett-White: If the diplomatic machinery is used and does not produce agreement, what is the correct mechanism for reaching consensus?

Ambassador Liu: If you have not tried the diplomatic negotiations, how can you prejudge the outcome? You know, we have differences with several neighboring countries. Take for example, China has 14 neighbors. We reached treaty and agreements on the border arrangements with 12 of them.

That means diplomatic negotiations are effective, and we can resolve disputes through bilateral negotiations. China has disputes with Vietnam, yet through friendly and time-consuming process of negotiation, we reached an agreement with Vietnam on the Beibu Gulf, with regard to maritime delimitation and how to manage disputes. China has been working for peaceful settlement of dispute.

We understand these are difficult issues, as different countries have different claims. But first of all, we should make it clear that it is not that China is claiming these islands now; China was the very first country to name the islands, to develop the islands and to manage the islands.

Before 1970s, of all the neighboring countries, no one had challenged China's sovereignty over those islands. Only when oil and resources were found did they start to scramble to claim rights.

Up to now, 42 islands and reefs had been illegally occupied by Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia. We are not going to war with these countries. We do not want to have a fight with them, but we stand firm with regard to China's sovereignty over these islands. We believe what they are doing is illegal occupation of the islands.

And we propose that we can shelve the disputes. We can have negotiations to try to find a solution as to how to handle the disputes. At the same time, we can have joint development. So our position is: shelving disputes and common development. So that has been our position all along and is still our position.

Alessandra Galloni: And this will count for the Philippine's claims as well, in other words to jointly develop…

Ambassador Liu: Yes, of course. You know, we are open to negotiations. The Philippines, they can put forward their proposals. And we can have our proposals and we'll meet half way. Any negotiation is a process of compromise. And the statement issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday is still calling for negotiations with the Philippines. Now they have elected a new government. We do hope that they will change their course, return to the negotiation table, return to the bilateral talks with China. The door is always open.

Alessandra Galloni: Has there been any indication from the new Philippine government that they would like to return to the table?

Ambassador Liu: We do not have specifics with regard to their response regarding the arbitration case, but we read some positive signal from the Philippine government that they want to have a good relation with China; they still believe good relation between China and the Philippines is in the Philippines' interest and they would like to have friendly discussions with us, but so far we haven't heard anything about their official position on the arbitration, or any change of their position on the arbitration case.

Simon Robinson: There are very strong arguments why China would have the claim to those islands and why the process that's going through in The Hague is not right. Why do many parts of the world still see China as the "bad player" in this?

Ambassador Liu: When you say "many", I'm not so sure about "many". I've been very straight forward in my Q&A at IISS not long ago. I think before America's so-called ‘rebalancing in Asia Pacific', the South China Sea was very quiet, very peaceful. China was talking to the neighboring countries.

We had a Declaration of Conduct. And the Philippines was talking to us. Once the Americans came in, so-called "rebalancing", things changed dramatically. The Vietnamese changed their position with regard to talking to China. The Philippines changed their position. I think the American move in the Asia Pacific emboldened those countries to change the traditional channel of negotiation with China. And they probably believe that they have the Americans behind them, and they can get a better deal with China. So I'm very suspicious of American motives.

America openly supports the Philippines in this case. And they got Japan. America is the superpower. America has some allies. I don't know what kind of influence they try to exert on their allies. So we've heard this chorus of countries, but I don't think there are many. There are some. They might be the minority but they can make a big noise. I heard that the G7 made a noise, but the G7 is not the world. I think the G7 should realize their influence on world affairs is history or yesterday's story. But they still believe they are the most influential power in today's world. We are strongly opposed to the statement by the G7 with regard to the South China Sea issue, with regard to the tribunal case. We don't think they are on the right side of the arguments.

John Foley: Speaking of the large developing countries, India recently said it's been approaching Vietnam to supply missiles that it makes. Now this is a tiny, tiny incremental step in the bigger picture that we are talking about here, but it is a step nonetheless. And Indian defense officials, they are not on the record, but they made no secret of the fact that this is with a view to trying to dilute, perhaps, China's influence over disputed waters. I don't want to focus just on that but basically it's an example of how other countries are sort of getting involved.

You might say it's unwelcome but it's becoming not just traditional countries that have been locked in the dispute. It seems to be spreading. Is that something that you are concerned about?

Ambassador Liu: Not to my concern. I think for the Vietnamese Government and Party, to have a good relation with China is in the national interest of Vietnam. Their President, their Party Secretary have visited China very often. It's always China's position to have a good neighborhood policy. No foreign relationship is more important than the relationship with your neighbors. That applies to any country. So we attach great importance to our relations with Vietnam.

You know relationship goes up and down, back and forth. During Vietnam's war against the Americans, China and Vietnam were allies. We fought shoulder to shoulder. And after the war, China and Vietnam fought each other. It's not because of us. I think the Vietnamese made a wrong judgment. They were on the wrong side of history. Now I think people reflect on what was happening in the past and realize what are in the best interest of the two countries. We are both developing countries. I think we have more in common. The commonality between China and Vietnam is greater than the differences between us. I'm confident about the relation between China and Vietnam.

We also have a good relationship with India. When Prime Minister Modi came to office, the relationship has grown stronger and stronger. President Xi Jinping visited India and Prime Minister Modi also visited China. Prime Minister Modi even took our President to his hometown and, you know, that's a very special arrangement. India is one of the largest neighbors of China. We have very good cooperation in the BRICS. India and China are really the two largest developing countries. There is more common ground, more common interests that bind our two countries together than the differences that divide us.

To answer your question about missiles, we do hope that countries in the region will do more positive things – things that are conducive to stability, prosperity – rather than the opposite.

Mark John:France has proposed to European countries to take part in joint South China Sea patrol. Is China open to that?

Ambassador Liu: I would say now the situation in the South China Sea is calm and peaceful. There is no reason for military involvement from outside power at all. Americans said they are there for so-called safeguarding freedom of navigation. We think this is a false argument. As I said, before their "rebalancing", the South China Sea was very quiet, very peaceful, and very stable.

One of China's long-term position with regard to the dispute of the South China Sea is what we call "dual-track approach". One track is bilateral negotiations. We realize there is a dispute. We engage with Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia – countries that we have a dispute with bilaterally. The other track is China and the ASEAN countries – 10 countries – working together to maintain peace and stability in the South China Sea. As a result of this work, we have the Declaration of Conduct to guide how we should behave, how to operate in the South China Sea. Three years ago, we started the process of working on a "code of conduct". The Declaration sets the principle. And the "code of conduct" will be more detailed guidance about how countries should behave, how they should work together; when it comes to a difficulty, a problem, a contradiction, how we should work together, coordinate, and try to find a solution. So we believe this region – because of China's proposal, because of the collaboration between China and ASEAN – it has been peaceful and quiet.

Yet Americans now send more reconnaissance planes and warships. What they are doing is not for safeguarding free navigation. They are there to challenge China's sovereignty over the islands and reefs. And they make a dangerous provocation. China has a legitimate right to check what they are doing. The South China Sea is very wide. There is a lot of space and area for American warships and planes to go through. Yet they are not interested in the open sea. They are more interested in areas close to China's islands and reefs. What are their intentions? If they do not try to provoke, I think the area and the region will be very peaceful, very stable. So there is no reason for foreign fleet to go to the South China Sea to patrol, to protect the free flights, the freedom of navigation.

So far we have not heard a single case that a merchandise vessel or whatever run into problem, or was restricted with regard to their freedom of navigation. Not at all. The Lloyds, a very prestigious insurance company, never regards the South China Sea as a risky area. If they found it risky, they would raise the insurance premium. They think the risk is very low and there is no reason at all for them to give any warning to their ship owners. So I think this issue is really of Americans' making. They want to make an excuse so that they can have more military presence.

Mark John: And can you reassure the Americans therefore that there aren't any plans by China to reclaim and build on the Scarborough Shoal?

Ambassador Liu: Why should we give Americans reassurance of that? I think there is a misperception of why China is doing this. First you have to realize that is Chinese territory. China has sovereignty on the territory. Likewise, foreign countries cannot tell the British government what to do, or not to do, on your territory or on the islands that belong to you.

Before the Americans made up this things, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia – countries that have claims on the islands that they illegally occupied – have had constructions long since. Yet the Americans turned a blind eye to this. The Philippines and Vietnam all have deployed military forces on these islands. It is not China who did all this construction. China is a late comer.

Some people say that China has done it on such a big scale, so that's why they are concerned about this. China is a large country and our islands are bigger. Big or small is not the base for an argument, but whether it is right or wrong.

First of all, if construction on the island is wrong, why do Americans and Europeans turn a blind eye to the Philippines and Vietnam? Secondly, the Philippines and Vietnam are doing all these things on illegally occupied territories, whereas China is undertaking constructions on our own islands, not illegally occupied islands, and also mostly for civilian purposes.

China is not doing this construction for our own interest. We are also providing public service. We build lighthouses, rescue centre, and maintenance service center. I read some reports, in fact by you, Reuters, that some ship owners from Singapore, Southeast Asia, give us a big hand for these constructions. They said that because of the facilities built by China, when it comes to rescue efforts, it saves more time and increases chances of survival. So it has been welcomed by ship owners and by neighbouring countries. So we are doing the right thing.

Simon Robinson: Why does Washington want to challenge China's sovereignty in the South China Sea?

Ambassador Liu: They want to find an excuse to have their strong military presence in the South China Sea and in the Asia Pacific. If it is so quiet, what is the reason for them to be there?

Alessandra Galloni: Going back to your lighthouses, and this mention of the rescue efforts that have helped other countries, one of the things China has said is that this reclaiming, building lighthouses and other initiatives, are to the benefit also of the international community. Could you explain that a little bit better? You mentioned certain rescue efforts which take less time. What else exactly?

Ambassador Liu: There are many. I have a laundry list of all the services available, such as water supply, lighthouse, environmental reservation, and scientific research.

Alessandra Galloni: And this would benefit specifically the international community?

Ambassador Liu: Yes, of course. And we are open also. We may have some joint research in the future with British scientists with regard to marine conservation. When asked if there is a possibility for foreign journalists to land on some of the reefs and islands, our foreign minister responded by saying when conditions are ripe, we certainly would welcome foreign journalists.

Alessandra Galloni: Because there is the sense that the inability of doing that, not letting journalists in, there is something to hide.

Ambassador Liu: We want to make your trip more comfortable.

Alessandra Galloni: We are journalists. We don't need comfort.

Ambassador Liu: China is a very hospitable country. I hope you will not be faced with the situation as in Iraq, Syria.

Alessandra Galloni: So it is for our protection.

Ambassador Liu: For your safety. I just received a delegation from Chinese military. They are here for consultation with British military. I asked them when they would be ready to receive foreign journalists. We really would like to have some British journalists, especially for those who are open-minded, not biased against China, doing good reporting. I would include a reporter from Reuters in the pool. He said in due course, we will get journalists in. But now construction is still going on. I don't think your journalists will be happy when there are cranes over their head.

Alessandra Galloni: The decision is a military one. I thought they are civilian projects. Why is it up to the military to decide?

Ambassador Liu: The majority of them are civilian. But there are some military facilities. As for the question why China is building military facilities, you should ask the Americans. They made us feel threatened. It is not we who are threatening the Americans. They sent their warships and military aircrafts so close to us. We need to do something to protect ourselves.

John Foley: One of the things that always puzzled me when I lived in China, this may sound very na?ve, but I am just trying to think about this with no cultural baggage. The things that give China the legitimacy as a growing, maybe adolescent superpower, or future superpower, they are things like a huge population, rising wages, rising standards of university education and a very globalized approach to things like trade and finance. They are not land borders. I've always wondered given that China has so much legitimacy through showing other countries how to overcome traditional restrictions and borders, why do you care so much about some uninhabited islands when really what makes China a superpower is things that have nothing to do with borders and sea?

Ambassador Liu: I think that is in China's DNA. China has been suffering badly in the hands of foreign powers in the past hundred years. The other day I was with a Chinese delegation touring British parliament. And there was a senior official who asked me whether that was the room where the British parliament debated about launching the opium war against China. I said "exactly". The Chinese people have a long memory of what we suffered, when many unequal treaties were imposed on China.

I often share one story with visitors from China and with my staff. This Embassy is the very first Chinese mission overseas. While we should feel proud of the tradition, we are not proud of the reason why this has become China's very first mission abroad.

That's a result of the Treaty of Yantai (a city in Shandong Province) imposed by the British Empire. A translator of the British legation in China was killed in a fight with local people in Yunnan after he had shot dead a local resident. The British Empire took advantage of this incident and imposed this Treaty of Yantai on China. It contains three basic articles: one, pay compensation of 200,000 taels of silver; two, open up four more ports along the Yangtze River; three, and the most humiliating, send a minister to Britain to make apology, face to face, to Queen Victoria.

China was weak then after the Opium War, could do nothing but pay the money, open up the ports, and send this poor minister, my very first predecessor to Britain. But the Emperor realized it was a very humiliating mission, and that since there were many ministers in China from many countries, from Britain, France, Italy, and many other European countries, he decided to turn this minister with one mission of apology to a resident minister in order to save face.

So the first resident Chinese minister was sent overseas. His mission was to make apology. The first letter presented by a Chinese resident minister to a foreign head of state was not the letter of his credential but a letter of apology. This was a humiliating past. It's always remembered.

John Foley: Do you think the young people in China, who have Taobao, Weixin and holidays in Thailand, do you think they would care about this, what the government talks about all the time?

Ambassador Liu: I think the majority do. From time to time, I receive invitations to talk to the students in Beida (Beijng University) and other universities, and to Chinese students in many universities here in the UK. Many of them see me as a hero because of my interview on BBC Newsnight with Jeremy Paxman, defending China's position on Japanese Prime Minister Abe's visit to the war shrine, on Diaoyudao and other issues. And I was told that I have millions of fans in universities and colleges. So there is a high enthusiasm and patriotism among young people. They care about what China should be today and what China will be in the future.

We have lost so many territories, so people care about the territory we have. In China, there's an old saying, "one inch of land is worth the same amount in gold". We are not asking for any territory that does not belong to us, but we'll defend every inch of our land at any cost. I hope that answers your question.

Alessandra Galloni: Thank you, Ambassador Liu, for giving the interview.

Ambassador Liu: I look forward to meeting you again.

Trudeau visits Sina Weibo
May gets little gasp as EU extends deadline for sufficient progress in Brexit talks
Ethiopian FM urges strengthened Ethiopia-China ties
Yemen's ex-president Saleh, relatives killed by Houthis
Most Popular
Hot Topics

...
两个人hd高清在线观看| 久久久亚洲人| 天天色综合色| 国产传媒欧美日韩成人精品大片| 日韩在线精品强乱中文字幕| 在线播放成人| 欧美一级网址| 99久久亚洲国产日韩美女| 校园春色亚洲| 人狥杂交一区欧美二区| 国产传媒在线观看| av影片在线| 91黄页在线观看| av今日在线| 华人av在线| 色资源二区在线视频| 99爱在线观看| 中文字幕色婷婷在线视频| 川上优av中文字幕一区二区| 黄色在线观看视频网站| 精品精品导航| 国产精品xx| 日韩伦理在线| japanese23hdxxxx日韩| 三上悠亚激情av一区二区三区| 碰碰在线视频| 外国电影一区二区| 日韩一级视频| 电影91久久久| 国产成人福利av| 欧美一区自拍| 国产亚洲欧美日韩在线观看一区二区 | 草民福利视频| www成人免费观看网站| 妞干网免费视频| 天堂在线视频中文网| 欧美5-7sexvideos处| 在线观看国产福利视频| 国产专区在线| 成人在线app| 国产福利电影在线播放| 韩日精品一区| 亚洲精品一区在线| 免费精品国产| 一本精品一区二区三区| 日韩视频精品在线观看| 美女诱惑一区二区| 国产尤物一区二区| 91蜜桃免费观看视频| 日本一二三四高清不卡| 一区二区高清视频在线观看| 精品免费在线视频| 制服丝袜成人动漫| 亚洲另类xxxx| 美女撒尿一区二区三区| 成人综合社区| 小小的日本在线观看免费色网| 色先锋av影音| 伊人75在线| 麻豆视频在线观看免费| 国产在线88av| 日本超碰一区二区| 欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区三区| 欧美日韩国产亚洲一区| 日本不卡视频一二三区| 成人午夜免费av| 中文字幕亚洲在| 欧美性高潮在线| 日韩美一区二区三区| 中文字幕亚洲第一| 1069视频| 九一免费看片| 一级在线视频| 黄网在线免费看| 国产一区二区三区免费观看在线| 欧美欧美黄在线二区| 亚洲国产导航| 国产剧情av麻豆香蕉精品| 国产婷婷色一区二区三区四区| 亚洲国产精品精华液网站| 在线不卡中文字幕| 中文字幕在线日韩| 新婚的少妇hd中文字幕| 扒开腿狂躁女人爽出白浆2| 在线免费看污| 搞黄网站在线看| 欧美经典影片视频网站| 欧美电影免费播放| 免费在线欧美视频| 国产性做久久久久久| 天天操天天色综合| 欧美精品一区二区三区在线| 欧美成人激情图片网| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久青梅| 丁香花高清视频完整版在线观看| 国产二区在线播放| 亚洲www免费| 久久综合影院| 久久久久国产精品午夜一区| xnxx国产精品| 一本一本大道香蕉久在线精品 | 亚洲欧美在线aaa| 欧美三级三级三级| 色狠狠久久aa北条麻妃| 欧美成人禁片在线www| 成人在线看片网站| 中国av在线播放| 国产日韩在线观看视频| 综合久久综合| 国产成人av电影在线观看| 一区二区三区色| 欧美成人aa大片| 久久69精品久久久久久国产越南| www91在线观看| 亚洲成人影院在线观看| 美女福利一区二区三区| 中文字幕亚洲影视| 免费高清在线一区| 国产精品嫩草99a| 69成人精品免费视频| 久久国产精品免费视频 | jizzjizz日本护士免费| 国产精品久久久久一区二区国产| 四虎4545www精品视频| av亚洲在线观看| 男男视频亚洲欧美| 亚洲精品你懂的| 精品国产一区二区三区忘忧草| 久久久久久久久电影| 菠萝蜜视频网站入口| 日本a级在线| 日韩免费精品| 午夜亚洲视频| 国产精品国产三级国产有无不卡 | 久久久999精品视频| 欧美精品色图| 韩国视频理论视频久久| 99热免费精品在线观看| 同房视频网站| 不卡的电视剧免费网站有什么| 看黄色免费网站| 中文字幕av一区二区三区高| 风间由美一区| 亚洲二区视频在线| 久久uomeier| 亚洲成人久久一区| 91av精品| 亚洲码在线观看| www.久久爱.com| 国产一区二区三区视频| 精品久久久中文字幕| 在线观看成人网| 大肉大捧一进一出好爽| 国产区在线看| 亚洲美女久久| 国产一区二区在线观看视频| 性做久久久久久久免费看| 亚洲人午夜精品| fpee性欧美| 欧美黄色激情| 天堂资源在线亚洲| 黄色精品一二区| 日韩欧美在线观看视频| 久久亚洲电影天堂| 成色在线视频| 国产福利91精品一区二区| 亚洲毛片在线| 亚洲乱码国产乱码精品精98午夜| 亚洲精品网站在线播放gif| 国产精品伦理一区二区三区| 天天综合视频在线观看| 欧洲vs亚洲vs国产| 国产精品1024| 欧美三级日韩三级国产三级| 欧美一级免费看| 神马电影在线观看| aiss精品大尺度系列| 久久99精品国产麻豆婷婷| 色婷婷激情综合| 久久久久久久国产| 在线成人福利| 91成人在线精品视频| 九九热在线视频观看这里只有精品| 狠狠做深爱婷婷久久综合一区| 欧美大尺度激情区在线播放| 天天干狠狠干| 精品国产三级| 精品一区二区免费在线观看| 欧日韩精品视频| 中文字幕乱在线伦视频中文字幕乱码在线| 黄视频在线播放| 亚洲欧洲美洲国产香蕉| 成人av网址在线| 日韩免费成人网| 伊人免费视频| 国产污视频在线播放| 91久久视频| 性欧美大战久久久久久久久| 久久99久国产精品黄毛片入口| 日韩手机在线导航| 国产视频精品xxxx| 天天操夜夜爽| 欧洲午夜精品| 精品制服美女丁香| 欧美精品久久99久久在免费线| 视频一区二区精品的福利| 免费大片在线观看www| 欧美jizz| 亚洲欧美一区二区久久| 欧美超级乱淫片喷水| 亚洲一区二区三区精品中文字幕| 涩涩在线视频| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠8888米奇| 网站黄色在线观看| 日本中文在线| 在线看片不卡| 亚洲午夜日本在线观看| 久久久久久久爱| 香港伦理在线| 亚洲精品a级片| 亚洲伊人色欲综合网| 国内精久久久久久久久久人| 搞黄视频免费在线观看| 日韩一区二区三区免费播放| 成人欧美一区二区三区1314| 不卡伊人av在线播放| 精华区一区二区三区| 成人av二区| 亚洲欧美日韩一区| 久久久久亚洲精品| 日本中文字幕伦在线观看| 欧美日本不卡高清| 一区二区久久久久| 好想男人揉我下面好多水| 最新黄网在线观看| 亚洲视频www| 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区五区| 国产高清av| 全球最大av网站久久| 国产自产v一区二区三区c| 欧美成人vps| 色视频www在线播放国产人成| 伊色综合久久之综合久久| 久久综合九色综合97婷婷女人| 一区二区三区亚洲| 五月激情在线| 91精品成人| 福利视频一区二区| 国产偷窥女洗浴在线观看亚洲| 美女福利一区二区三区| 国产剧情av麻豆香蕉精品| 亚洲久久久久久久久久| 69**夜色精品国产69乱| 欧美午夜美女看片| 亚洲精品自拍区在线观看| 第一av在线| 日韩精品五月天| 日韩视频在线你懂得| 99视频免费| 亚洲一区二区三区四区电影 | 亚洲电影中文字幕| 日本韩国福利视频| 欧美理论视频| 亚洲国产综合视频在线观看| 性xxxx奶大欧美高清| 日韩欧美成人激情| 成人网18免费看| 人人精品亚洲| 亚洲免费伊人电影| 亚洲国产精品久久久久婷婷软件| 二区三区不卡| 国产成人综合网| 丝袜情趣国产精品| 求av网址在线观看| 老**午夜毛片一区二区三区 | 欧美aaa大片| 欧美国产美女| 91福利国产成人精品照片| 黄网址在线看| 免费看成人人体视频| 亚洲黄色在线视频| 精品一区二区三区高清免费不卡 | 欧美三区视频| 3d动漫精品啪啪| 性色a∨人人爽网站| 国产高清久久| 精品视频全国免费看| wwwwww99| 国产一区二区亚洲| 欧美日韩亚洲一区二| 禁网站在线观看免费视频| 天堂资源在线亚洲| 岛国精品视频在线播放| 黄网站网址视频| 国产亚洲欧美日韩在线观看一区二区 | 午夜日韩成人影院| 91丨九色丨蝌蚪富婆spa| 欧美精品999| 精品国产第一福利网站| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文字幕色伊伊 | 日韩黄色大片| 欧美中文字幕久久| 国产特级淫片免费看| 91精品国产自产在线观看永久∴| 欧美日韩视频在线第一区| 国精产品999国精产品官网| 性xxxx欧美老肥妇牲乱| 在线播放日韩导航| 中文字幕高清在线观看| 日韩视频一区二区三区在线播放免费观看| 日韩精品影音先锋| 欧美日韩视频精品二区| 免费日韩精品中文字幕视频在线| 日韩精品一区二区视频| 午夜激情在线观看| 国内精品伊人久久久久影院对白| 日韩视频免费在线| 91色在线看| 久久久噜噜噜久噜久久综合| 四虎成人影院网址| aaa国产精品视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线| avtt天堂资源网站| 国内精品久久久久久久影视蜜臀 | 9lporm自拍视频区在线| 91亚洲国产成人精品一区二三 | 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区视频| 中文字幕久久午夜不卡| 国产又白又嫩又紧又爽18p| 日韩成人一级| 欧洲色大大久久| 在线看中文字幕| 日韩国产高清影视| 久久精品国产欧美亚洲人人爽| 女人高潮被爽到呻吟在线观看 | 亚洲男女一区二区三区| 免费的黄色片| 我不卡手机影院| 亚洲高清av在线| a篇片在线观看网站| 成人免费黄色大片| 最近免费中文字幕在线第一页| 亚洲午夜免费| 欧美一a一片一级一片| 亚洲精品视频在线免费| 青青草97国产精品免费观看无弹窗版| 久久深夜福利免费观看| 国产91精品在线| 亚洲主播在线播放| 7878视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩专区| 久久视频国产精品免费视频在线| 另类专区亚洲| 亚洲一区在线看| 国产天堂av| 蜜臀av性久久久久蜜臀aⅴ| 欧美人与性动交a欧美精品| 亚洲欧美在线人成swag| 五月天久久比比资源色| 国产网友自拍电影在线| 日韩1区2区3区| 午夜剧场成人观在线视频免费观看| 日本一区二区乱| 欧美视频你懂的| 成人性生交大片免费看午夜| 成人午夜免费电影| 国产精品一区二区资源| 亚洲影院天堂中文av色| 久久电影国产免费久久电影 | 北岛玲一区二区三区四区| 明星国产一级毛片范冰冰视频| 欧美精品色图| 亚洲女人天堂视频| 亚洲一区站长工具| 亚洲成人资源在线| 中文字幕在线免费专区| 国产麻豆欧美日韩一区| 精品国产高清自在线一区二区三区| 大片网站久久| 亚洲色图五月天| 国产精品黄色片| 在线免费观看成人短视频| 国产黄色免费在线观看| 久久综合中文字幕| xfplay每日更新av资源在线| 性色一区二区三区| 欧美精品激情在线| 人妖一区二区三区| 欧美精品一区二区久久久| 色黄视频在线观看| 欧美日韩国产限制| 欧美性jizz18性欧美| seseavlu视频在线| 中文字幕欧美激情一区| va中文字幕| 狠狠色综合播放一区二区| 午夜国产一级| 欧美日韩一视频区二区| 欧美精品在线视频观看| 欧美一区 二区|